How does passkey adoption differ of DIY & 3rd-party solutions?

Vincent Delitz

Vincent

Created: January 8, 2025

Updated: February 17, 2025

Do you want to learn more?

Read full blog post

What are the differences between self-developed and third-party authentication systems in passkey adoption?#

When adopting passkeys for user authentication, organizations must choose between self-developed systems and third-party authentication providers. Each approach has distinct advantages and challenges, which are outlined below:

differences self developed third party authentication passkeys

Self-Developed Authentication Systems#

Advantages:

  • Complete Control: You can tailor the system to meet specific needs, including advanced security features and seamless integration of passkeys.
  • Flexibility: Self-developed systems allow for customization of user flows and interface elements without relying on external roadmaps.
  • Data Privacy: All user authentication data remains in-house, reducing reliance on external vendors.

Challenges:

  • Development Cost: Building and maintaining a custom system requires significant time, budget, and expertise.
  • Technical Complexity: Passkeys require adherence to WebAuthn standards, which involve advanced cryptographic protocols and device compatibility considerations. Also updates occur frequently which need to be incorporated
  • Ongoing Maintenance: Ensuring the system stays updated with new security standards and features can be resource-intensive.
Enterprise Icon

Get free passkey whitepaper for enterprises.

Get for free

Third-Party Authentication Systems#

Advantages:

  • Quick Implementation: Providers like Keycloak, Corbado or Amazon Cognito offer out-of-the-box solutions for passkey support.
  • Lower Upfront Costs: Leveraging existing infrastructure reduces the need for significant development efforts.
  • Scalability: These systems are built to handle large-scale deployments and ensure compliance with global standards.

Challenges:

  • Limited Customization: Dependence on the provider’s roadmap can restrict flexibility in implementing unique features.
  • Vendor Lock-In: Migrating away from a third-party system can be challenging and costly.
  • Privacy Concerns: Sensitive user data is often processed by external servers, requiring careful vetting of the provider’s compliance and security measures.

Choosing the Right Option#

The choice depends on your organization’s priorities. If customization and data control are critical, a self-developed system might be the better fit. However, if speed and scalability are the main concerns, third-party providers offer a streamlined path to integrating passkeys.

For enterprises with hybrid setups, combining self-developed systems with third-party components can offer a balanced approach.

Do you want to learn more?

Read full blog post

Share this article


LinkedInTwitterFacebook

Enjoyed this read?

🤝 Join our Passkeys Community

Share passkeys implementation tips and get support to free the world from passwords.

🚀 Subscribe to Substack

Get the latest news, strategies, and insights about passkeys sent straight to your inbox.