Why are WebViews in mobile apps a challenge for passkeys?

WebViews, often used in mobile apps to render web content, present unique challenges when implementing passkeys. These challenges stem from limited support for WebAuthn features within many WebView environments.

• Many WebViews lack full support for WebAuthn APIs, making it difficult to enable passkey functionality.
• Native browsers like Chrome or Safari are typically more passkey-ready than WebViews.

WebView capabilities vary by platform and version:

• WKWebView on iOS offers better support but may still lack key WebAuthn features.
• Android WebView implementations are often less consistent and may require custom configurations.

• WebViews often have restricted environments that limit access to critical security features, such as hardware-based authenticators (e.g., biometrics).
• This can prevent seamless passkey creation or usage within the app.

If passkeys don’t work within WebViews, users may need to switch to an external browser or app for authentication, disrupting the login flow.

1. Test WebView Compatibility:

   • Use tools like Corbado’s Passkeys Analyzer to identify WebView limitations.
   • Evaluate the specific WebView types (e.g., WKWebView vs. Android WebView) used in your app.

2. Fallback Options:

   • Redirect users to native browsers for authentication if WebView support is insufficient.
   • Maintain alternate MFA methods during the transition phase.

3. Encourage Native Implementation:

   • Where possible, use native app components for passkey functionality instead of relying on WebViews.

4. Work with Vendors:

   • Collaborate with WebView and platform providers to advocate for better WebAuthn support in future updates.

WebViews pose significant challenges for passkeys due to limited WebAuthn support and security constraints. By understanding these limitations and implementing strategies like fallback options and native app components, you can ensure a smoother passkey rollout.